基于Argo实测流场数据对5套海洋模式产品中赤道太平洋中层流的评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2020.03.001

海洋学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 1-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2020.03.001

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

基于Argo实测流场数据对5套海洋模式产品中赤道太平洋中层流的评估

周永远^1,2, 闫运伟^*1,2, 邢小罡^1,2, 柴扉^1,2,3

1.卫星海洋环境动力学国家重点实验室,浙江杭州 310012;
2.自然资源部第二海洋研究所,浙江杭州 310012;
3.美国缅因大学海洋科学学院,缅因州欧洛诺市 04469

收稿日期:2020-03-17 发布日期:2020-09-15
通讯作者: *闫运伟(1984-),男,助理研究员,主要从事海洋环流、上层海洋温盐结构、海温日变化等方面的研究。E-mail:yanyunwei@sio.org.cn
作者简介:周永远(1995-),男,河南省邓州市人,主要从事赤道太平洋深层环流研究。E-mail:oceanzyy@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1401601);国家自然科学基金(41730536);自然资源部第二海洋研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(14283)

Assessment of the Pacific Equatorial Intermediate Currents in five ocean models outputs based on the observation calculated from Argo trajectories

ZHOU Yongyuan^1,2, YAN Yunwei^{* 1,2}, XING Xiaogang^1,2, CHAI Fei^1,2,3

1. State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Hangzhou 310012, China;
2. Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China;
3. School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono 04669, USA

Received:2020-03-17 Published:2020-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以Argo轨迹资料计算的赤道太平洋中层流(1 000 m深度流场)作为实测数据,从空间结构特征和时间变化特征两方面对5套常用海洋模式产品(OFES、LICOM、HYCOM、ECCO2和SODA)进行了评估。Argo流场显示赤道太平洋中层流呈条带状结构,且存在明显的西强东弱和南强北弱特征。此外,赤道太平洋中层流存在明显的季节变化且其相位关于赤道对称。5套模式产品的评估结果表明,SODA流场与实测流场最接近,其时空变化特征都与实测流场基本一致;其次是ECCO2流场,除流场动能偏小以外,其他各方面都与实测流场一致;OFES、LICOM和HYCOM流场的模拟效果较差,但都能再现条带状结构特征。

关键词: 赤道太平洋, 中层流场, Argo轨迹, 模式评估

Abstract: A preliminary assessment of the Pacific Equatorial Intermediate Currents (EICs) in five ocean models outputs (OFES, LICOM, HYCOM, ECCO2 and SODA) were conducted according to the spatial and temporal features using observation data which was calculated from Argo trajectories. The EICs in Argo currents field are mainly composed of the alternating east-west zonal jets. In the east-west direction, the currents are strong in the western but weak in the eastern, in the south-north direction, the currents are strong in the southern but weak in the northern. Besides, there are seasonal variations and the phase of seasonal variations is characterized by westward propagation and meridionally symmetrical on the equator. The assessment results show that SODA is the best dataset in these five models, all the characteristics are almost consistent with the observation. The second is ECCO2, the flow field is almost consistent with the observation except the kinetic energy. Then comes the OFES, LICOM and HYCOM, all of them are able to simulate the structures of the alternating zonal jets.

Key words: tropical Pacific Ocean, mid-depth currents, Argo trajectory, ocean models assessment

中图分类号:

P731

周永远, 闫运伟, 邢小罡, 柴扉. 基于Argo实测流场数据对5套海洋模式产品中赤道太平洋中层流的评估[J]. 海洋学研究, 2020, 38(3): 1-9.

ZHOU Yongyuan, YAN Yunwei, XING Xiaogang, CHAI Fei. Assessment of the Pacific Equatorial Intermediate Currents in five ocean models outputs based on the observation calculated from Argo trajectories[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences, 2020, 38(3): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] TOURRE Y M, WHITE W B. ENSO signals in global upper-ocean temperature[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1995, 25(6): 1317-1332.
[2] ASHOK K, YAMAGATA T. Climate change: The El Niño with a difference[J]. Nature, 2009, 461(7263): 481-484.
[3] ALEXANDER M A, BLADÉ I, NEWMAN M, et al. The atmospheric bridge: The influence of ENSO teleconnections on air-sea interaction over the global oceans[J]. Journal of Climate, 2002, 15(16): 2205-2231.
[4] TOOLE J M, ZOU E, MILLARD R C. On the circulation of the upper waters in the western equatorial Pacific Ocean[J]. Deep-Sea Research, Part A, 1988, 35(9): 1451-1482.
[5] HSU A C, XUE H, CHAI F, et al. Variability of the Pacific North Equatorial Current and its implications on Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) larval migration[J]. Fisheries Oceanography, 2017, 26(3): 251-267.
[6] MARIN F, KESTENARE E, DELCROIX T, et al. Annual reversal of the equatorial intermediate current in the Pacific: observations and model diagnostics[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2010, 40(5): 915-933.
[7] DIETZE H, LOEPTIEN U. Revisiting “nutrient trapping” in global coupled biogeochemical ocean circulation models[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2013, 27(2): 265-284.
[8] DUCET N, TRAON P Y L, REVERDIN G. Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(C8): 19477-19498.
[9] MCPHADEN M J, BUSALACCHI A J, CHENEY R, et al. The tropical ocean-global atmosphere observing system: a decade of progress[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(C7): 14169-14240.
[10] LAGERLOEF G S E, MITCHUM G T, LUKAS R B, et al. Tropical Pacific near surface current estimated from altimeter, wind, and drifter data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1999, 104(C10): 23313-23326.
[11] SUDRE J, MORROW R A. Global surface current: a high-resolution product for investigating ocean dynamics[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2008, 58(2): 101-118.
[12] DONGUY J R, MEYERS G. Mean annual variation of transport of major currents in the tropical Pacific Ocean[J]. Deep Sea Research Part I, 1996, 43(7): 1105-1122.
[13] JOHNSON G C, KUNZE E, MCTAGGART K E, et al. Temporal and spatial structure of the equatorial deep jets in the Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2002, 32(12): 3396-3407.
[14] FIRING E. Deep zonal currents in the central equatorial Pacific[J]. Journal of Marine Research, 1987, 45(4): 791-812.
[15] JOHNSON G C, SLOYAN B M, KESSLER W S, et al. Direct measurements of upper ocean currents and water properties across the tropical Pacific during the 1990s[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2002, 52(1): 31-61.
[16] MASUMOTO Y, SASAKI H, KAGIMOTO T, et al. A fifty-year eddy-resolving simulation of the world ocean-preliminary outcomes of OFES (OGCM for the Earth Simulator) [J]. Journal of Earth Simulator, 2004, 4(1): 35-56.
[17] LIU Hailong, LIN Pengfei, YU Yongqiang, et al. The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP Climate system Ocean Model (LICOM) version 2[J]. Acta Meteor Sinica, 2012, 26(3): 318-329.
[18] ERIC C, HARLEY H, JOSEPH M E, et al. US GODAE: global ocean prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model[J]. Oceanography, 2009, 22(2): 64-75.
[19] MENEMENLIS D, CAMPIN J M, HEIMBACH P, et al. ECCO2: high resolution global ocean and sea ice data synthesis[C]. AGU Fall Meeting, 2008.
[20] CARTON J A, GIESE B S. A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2008, 136(8): 2999-3017.
[21] 许建平.阿尔戈全球海洋观测大探秘[M].北京:海洋出版社,2002.
XU Jianping. Exploring of the Argo global oceanic observation system[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2002.
[22] 谢基平.利用ARGO浮标提取中层海流信息研究[D].南京:南京信息工程大学,2005.
XIE Jiping. A study on the acquirability of mid-depth current information by the Argo float[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information, 2005.
[23] PARK J J, KIM K, CRAWFORD W R. Inertial currents estimated from surface trajectories of ARGO floats[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(13): 137-151.
[24] PARK J J, KIM K, KING B A, et al. An advanced method to estimate deep currents from profiling floats[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2005, 22(8): 1294-1304.
[25] LEBEDEV K V, YOSHINARI H, MAXIMENKO N A, et al. Velocity data assessed from trajectories of Argo floats at parking level and at the sea surface[J]. IPRC Technical Note, 2007, 4(2): 1-16.
[26] XIE Jiping, ZHU Jiang. Estimation of the surface and mid-depth currents from Argo floats in the Pacific and error analysis[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2008, 73(1-2): 61-75.
[27] OLLITRAULT M, RANNOU J P. ANDRO: an Argo-based deep displacement dataset[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2013, 30(4): 759-788.
[28] CRAVATTE S, KESSLER W S, MARIN F. Intermediate zonal jets in the tropical Pacific Ocean observed by Argo float[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2012, 42(9): 1475-1485.
[29] 马强,汪嘉宁,王凡.六套海洋模式模拟热带西太平洋深层环流结果的对比分析[J].海洋与湖沼,2017,48(6): 1302-1317.
MA Qiang, WANG Jianing, WANG Fan. Deep-layer circulation in tropical western pacific ocean based on six ocean models outputs[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2017, 48(6): 1302-1317.
[30] 夏一凡,杜岩,王天宇,等.基于Argo轨迹资料反演热带太平洋中层流场条带状结构特征[J].热带海洋学报,2017,36(4): 1-9.
XIA Yifan, DU Yan, WANG Tianyu, et al. Mid-depth zonal jets and their characteristics in the tropical Pacific Ocean derived from Argo trajectory[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2017, 36(4): 1-9.
[31] LARGE W G, MCWILLIAMS J C, DONEY S C. Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1994, 32(4): 363.
[32] CANUTO V M, HOWARD A, CHENG Y, et al. Ocean turbulence. Part I: One-point closure model—Momentum and heat vertical diffusivities[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2001, 31(6): 1413-1426.
[33] PERSSON A. The story of the Hovmöller diagram: An (almost) eyewitness account[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2017, 98(5): 949-957.
[34] LUKAS R, FIRING E. The annual Rossby wave in the central equatorial Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1985, 15(1): 55-67.

基于Argo实测流场数据对5套海洋模式产品中赤道太平洋中层流的评估

Assessment of the Pacific Equatorial Intermediate Currents in five ocean models outputs based on the observation calculated from Argo trajectories

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李明明, 谭可易, 黄家辉, 谢玲玲, . 北部湾东北部水团和流场季节变化：2018—2019年观测数据分析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(3): 73-85.
[2]	宋晚郊, 张鹏, 孙凌, 唐世浩, 周芳成, . 基于DINEOF的风云极轨气象卫星海表温度重构方法研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 0, (): 10-18.
[3]	宋晚郊, 张鹏, 孙凌, 唐世浩, 周芳成, . 基于DINEOF的风云极轨气象卫星海表温度重构方法研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(2): 10-18.
[4]	沈远, 陈相宇, 张希疆, 叶云, 倪云林. 波浪在三维圆形岛地形上的绕射研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(2): 62-68.
[5]	张奕璞, 于硕, 黄大吉, 周泽斌, . 海南新村潟湖潮汐、潮流特征及其对营养盐的影响[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(2): 69-82.
[6]	梁海萍, 李团结, 梁海燕, 高璐. 海口市风暴潮分布特征与影响因子探析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(2): 83-92.
[7]	曾定勇, 宣基亮, 黄大吉, 等. 长江口海域潮汐和潮流的观测研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(1): 12-20.
[8]	张舒羽, 丁涛, 刘进宝, 等. 基于文献计量法的涌潮研究动态分析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2022, 40(1): 89-100.
[9]	周锋, 钱周奕, 刘安琪, 马晓, 倪晓波, 曾定勇, . 长江口及邻近海域底层水体低氧物理机制的研究进展[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(4): 17-38.
[10]	何天祺, 管卫兵, 曹振轶, 鲍敏, 李嵩, 李雨. 象山港牛鼻山水道潮流场的高频地波雷达观测与分析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(4): 109-122.
[11]	张家赢, 周锋, 田娣, 黄挺, . 苏门答腊岛西北海域中尺度涡源区特征与形成机制[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(3): 1-11.
[12]	牛原, 邱志伟, 刘瑞翔, 吴振宇, 常宇佳, 潘春天. SMAP卫星海表盐度产品精度评定与全球海表盐度特征分析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(3): 53-62.
[13]	李科, 苑福利, 刘厂. 基于相似系数的海温中长期统计预报方法研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(1): 67-78.
[14]	崔子健, 梁楚进, 蔺飞龙, 金魏芳, 丁涛, 王隽, . 安达曼海内孤立波的潜标观测分析研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2020, 38(4): 16-25.
[15]	吴寿常, 何海伦, 陈美香, 王渊, 蔺飞龙, . 基于WOA18数据集的印度洋等密度面年代际变化研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2020, 38(4): 26-39.