利用机器学习模型预测中国沿海海平面变化

陈建珩, 许东峰, 姚志雄

海洋学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 108-118.

PDF(2235 KB)
PDF(2235 KB)
海洋学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 108-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2024.03.009
研究论文

利用机器学习模型预测中国沿海海平面变化

作者信息 +

Prediction of sea level changes along the coast of China using machine learning models

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

该文利用线性回归函数,根据卫星测高及中国沿海6个验潮站数据估算出1993—2020年中国沿海绝对海平面上升速率为4.17±1.32 mm/a,相对海平面上升速率为4.47±0.90 mm/a。将1958—2020年的大气数据、海洋数据及气候模态指数作为预报因子,建立了长短期记忆神经网络模型(LSTM模型)、循环神经网络模型(RNN模型)、门控循环单元神经网络模型(GRU模型)和支持向量机回归模型(SVR模型)等多种神经网络模型对中国沿海6个验潮站周边的相对海平面变化趋势进行预测。模型评估结果表明,同时引入大气变量、海洋变量及气候模态指数变量的LSTM模型取得的预测值与观测值的平均相关系数和均方根误差分别为0.866和19.279 mm,在4种模型中表现最佳,可以作为一种新型的预测相对海平面变化的方法。

Abstract

Based on the data of satellite altimetry and six tide gauge stations along the coast of China, linear regression function was used to estimate the absolute sea level rise rate in the coastal areas of China from 1993 to 2020, which was 4.17±1.32 mm/a, and the relative sea level rise rate was 4.47±0.90 mm/a. Taking the atmospheric data, ocean data and climate modal index from 1958 to 2020 as prediction factors, a variety of neural network models such as long short-term memory neural network model (LSTM model), recurrent neural network model (RNN model), gated recurrent unit neural network model (GRU model) and support vector machine regression model (SVR model) were established to predict the trend of relative sea level changes around the six tide gauge stations along the coast of China. The model evaluation results show that the average correlation coefficient and root mean square error of the observed value and the predicted value obtained by the LSTM model that simultaneously introduces atmospheric and ocean variables and climate modal index variables are 0.866 and 19.279 mm, respectively, which performs the best among the four models, and therefore the LSTM model can be used as a new method for predicting relative sea level changes.

关键词

海平面上升 / 相对海平面 / 绝对海平面 / 垂直地壳运动 / 卫星测高 / 潮位 / LSTM神经网络模型 / 时间序列预测

Key words

sea level rise / relative sea level / absolute sea level / vertical land movement / satellite altimetry / tide level / LSTM neural network model / time series forecasting

引用本文

导出引用
陈建珩, 许东峰, 姚志雄. 利用机器学习模型预测中国沿海海平面变化[J]. 海洋学研究. 2024, 42(3): 108-118 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2024.03.009
CHEN Jianheng, XU Dongfeng, YAO Zhixiong. Prediction of sea level changes along the coast of China using machine learning models[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences. 2024, 42(3): 108-118 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2024.03.009
中图分类号: P731.34   

参考文献

[1]
MASSON-DELMOTTE V, ZHAI P, PIRANI A, et al. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis[M]. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2021: 2391.
[2]
VERMEER M, RAHMSTORF S. Global sea level linked to global temperature[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(51): 21527-21532.
We propose a simple relationship linking global sea-level variations on time scales of decades to centuries to global mean temperature. This relationship is tested on synthetic data from a global climate model for the past millennium and the next century. When applied to observed data of sea level and temperature for 1880-2000, and taking into account known anthropogenic hydrologic contributions to sea level, the correlation is >0.99, explaining 98% of the variance. For future global temperature scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report, the relationship projects a sea-level rise ranging from 75 to 190 cm for the period 1990-2100.
[3]
OPPENHEIMER M, GLAVOVIC B, HINKEL J, et al. Sea level rise and implications for low-lying islands, coasts and communities[M]//IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 321-445.
[4]
NEREM R S, BECKLEY B D, FASULLO J T, et al. Climate-change-driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(9): 2022-2025.
Using a 25-y time series of precision satellite altimeter data from TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, Jason-2, and Jason-3, we estimate the climate-change-driven acceleration of global mean sea level over the last 25 y to be 0.084 ± 0.025 mm/y Coupled with the average climate-change-driven rate of sea level rise over these same 25 y of 2.9 mm/y, simple extrapolation of the quadratic implies global mean sea level could rise 65 ± 12 cm by 2100 compared with 2005, roughly in agreement with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report (AR5) model projections.Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
[5]
自然资源部. 2022年中国海平面公报[EB/OL].(2023-04-05)[2023-08-25]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202304/t20230412_2781114.html.
[6]
WOODWORTH P L, MELET A, MARCOS M, et al. Forcing factors affecting sea level changes at the coast[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2019, 40(6): 1351-1397.
We review the characteristics of sea level variability at the coast focussing on how it differs from the variability in the nearby deep ocean. Sea level variability occurs on all timescales, with processes at higher frequencies tending to have a larger magnitude at the coast due to resonance and other dynamics. In the case of some processes, such as the tides, the presence of the coast and the shallow waters of the shelves results in the processes being considerably more complex than offshore. However, 'coastal variability' should not always be considered as 'short spatial scale variability' but can be the result of signals transmitted along the coast from 1000s km away. Fortunately, thanks to tide gauges being necessarily located at the coast, many aspects of coastal sea level variability can be claimed to be better understood than those in the deep ocean. Nevertheless, certain aspects of coastal variability remain under-researched, including how changes in some processes (e.g., wave setup, river runoff) may have contributed to the historical mean sea level records obtained from tide gauges which are now used routinely in large-scale climate research.
[7]
WANG Q S, PAN C H, ZHANG G Z. Impact of and adaptation strategies for sea-level rise on Yangtze River Delta[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018, 9(2): 154-160.
[8]
FENG X B, CHENG Y C. Observing sea levels in the China Seas from satellite altimetry[M]//Remote sensing of the Asian seas. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 321-338.
[9]
MENG L S, ZHUANG W, ZHANG W W, et al. Decadal sea level variability in the Pacific Ocean: Origins and climate mode contributions[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2019, 36(4): 689-698.
[10]
XI H, ZHANG Z Z, LU Y, et al. Long-term and interannual variation of the steric sea level in the South China Sea and the connection with ENSO[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2019, 35(3): 489.
[11]
SITHARA S, PRAMADA S K, THAMPI S G. Sea level prediction using climatic variables: A comparative study of SVM and hybrid wavelet SVM approaches[J]. Acta Geophysica, 2020, 68(6): 1779-1790.
[12]
ZUBIER K M, EYOUNI L S. Investigating the role of atmospheric variables on sea level variations in the eastern central Red Sea using an artificial neural network approach[J]. Oceanologia, 2020, 62(3): 267-290.
[13]
BALOGUN A L, ADEBISI N. Sea level prediction using ARIMA, SVR and LSTM neural network: Assessing the impact of ensemble ocean-atmospheric processes on models’ accuracy[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2021, 12(1): 653-674.
[14]
ADEBISI N, BALOGUN A L. A deep-learning model for national scale modelling and mapping of sea level rise in Malaysia: The past, present, and future[J]. Geocarto International, 2022, 37(23): 6892-6914.
[15]
MUSLIM T O, AHMED A N, MALEK M A, et al. Investigating the influence of meteorological parameters on the accuracy of sea-level prediction models in Sabah, Malaysia[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3): 1193.
[16]
FU Y G, ZHOU X H, SUN W K, et al. Hybrid model combining empirical mode decomposition, singular spectrum analysis, and least squares for satellite-derived sea-level anomaly prediction[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019, 40(20): 7817-7829.
[17]
ISLAM B U, AHMED S F. Short-term electrical load demand forecasting based on LSTM and RNN deep neural networks[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022: 2316474.
[18]
MAKRIDAKIS S, SPILIOTIS E, ASSIMAKOPOULOS V. Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194889.
[19]
FARINOTTI D, HUSS M, FÜRST J J, et al. A consensus estimate for the ice thickness distribution of all glaciers on earth[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2019, 12: 168-173.
[20]
SAENKO O A, YANG D, GREGORY J M, et al. Separating the influence of projected changes in air temperature and wind on patterns of sea level change and ocean heat content[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2015, 120(8): 5749-5765.
[21]
SMITH-KONTER B R, THORNTON G M, SANDWELL D T. Vertical crustal displacement due to interseismic deformation along the San Andreas fault: Constraints from tide gauges[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2014, 41(11): 3793-3801.
[22]
SUZUKI T, ISHII M. Long-term regional sea level changes due to variations in water mass density during the period 1981-2007[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(21): L21604.
[23]
OSTANCIAUX É, HUSSON L, CHOBLET G, et al. Present-day trends of vertical ground motion along the coast lines[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2012, 110(1/2/3/4): 74-92.
[24]
PFEFFER J, SPADA G, MÉMIN A, et al. Decoding the origins of vertical land motions observed today at coasts[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2017, 210(1): 148-165.
[25]
RAUCOULES D, LE COZANNET G, WÖPPELMANN G, et al. High nonlinear urban ground motion in Manila (Philippines) from 1993 to 2010 observed by DInSAR: Implications for sea-level measurement[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 139: 386-397.
[26]
HELIANI L S, WIDJAJANTI N, ENDRAYANTO I, et al. Preprocessing of coastal satellite altimetry, tide gauges, and GNSS data: Towards the possibility of detected vertical deformation of south Java Island[J]. Procedia Environ-mental Sciences, 2013, 17: 308-316.
[27]
ROVERE A, RAYMO M E, VACCHI M, et al. The analysis of last interglacial (MIS 5e) relative sea-level indicators: Reconstructing sea-level in a warmer world[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 159: 404-427.
[28]
VIGNUDELLI S, BIROL F, BENVENISTE J, et al. Satellite altimetry measurements of sea level in the coastal zone[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2019, 40(6): 1319-1349.
Satellite radar altimetry provides a unique sea level data set that extends over more than 25 years back in time and that has an almost global coverage. However, when approaching the coasts, the extraction of correct sea level estimates is challenging due to corrupted waveforms and to errors in most of the corrections and in some auxiliary information used in the data processing. The development of methods dedicated to the improvement of altimeter data in the coastal zone dates back to the 1990s, but the major progress happened during the last decade thanks to progress in radar technology [e.g., synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mode and Ka-band frequency], improved waveform retracking algorithms, the availability of new/improved corrections (e.g., wet troposphere and tidal models) and processing workflows oriented to the coastal zone. Today, a set of techniques exists for the processing of coastal altimetry data, generally called "coastal altimetry." They have been used to generate coastal altimetry products. Altimetry is now recognized as part of the integrated observing system devoted to coastal sea level monitoring. In this article, we review the recent technical advances in processing and the new technological capabilities of satellite radar altimetry in the coastal zone. We also illustrate the fast-growing use of coastal altimetry data sets in coastal sea level research and applications, as high-frequency (tides and storm surge) and long-term sea level change studies.
[29]
TANG X H, WANG F, CHEN Y L, et al. Warming trend in northern East China Sea in recent four decades[J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2009, 27(2): 185-191.
[30]
CHEN Z Y, WANG Z H. Yangtze Delta, China: Taihu lake-level variation since the 1950s, response to sea-level rise and human impact[J]. Environmental Geology, 1999, 37(4): 333-339.
[31]
WU P, VAN DER WAL W. Postglacial sealevels on a spherical, self-gravitating viscoelastic earth: Effects of lateral viscosity variations in the upper mantle on the inference of viscosity contrasts in the lower mantle[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2003, 211(1/2): 57-68.
[32]
YIN J, YU D P, YIN Z E, et al. Modelling the combined impacts of sea-level rise and land subsidence on storm tides induced flooding of the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China[J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 119(3): 919-932.
[33]
ZOU F, TENZER R, FOK H S, et al. The sea-level changes in Hong Kong from tide-gauge records and remote sensing observations over the last seven decades[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 6777-6791.
[34]
郭金运, 王建波, 胡志博, 等. 由TOPEX/Poseidon和Jason-1/2探测的1993—2012中国海海平面时空变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(9):3103-3120.
摘要
海平面变化是社会经济发展和科学研究的重要内容.利用1993年1月至2012年12月共20年的TOPEX/Poseidon、Jason-1和Jason-2卫星测高数据,研究中国海海平面的时空变化.首先通过三颗卫星伴飞阶段数据得到三颗卫星之间的逐点海面高系统偏差,进行逐点海面高改正,建立了20年的中国海海面高异常时间序列.分析了中国海海面高异常空间分布,给出了1月到12月月均平均海平面异常的空间变化规律.分析了中国海海面高异常的时变规律,分别给出了年、季度和月的海面上升速率.利用小波分析研究了中国海海面高异常周期变化规律,分别给出了渤海、黄海、东海和南海的海面高变化周期.讨论了ENSO对海面高异常的影响.
GUO J Y, WANG J B, HU Z B, et al. Temporal-spatial variations of sea level over China seas derived from altimeter data of TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1 and Jason-2 from 1993 to 2012[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(9): 3103-3120.
[35]
李建成, 王正涛, 胡建国. 联合多种卫星测高数据分析全球和中国海海平面变化[J]. 武汉测绘科技大学学报, 2000, 25(4):343-347.
LI J C, WANG Z T, HU J G. Mean sea level variation using historic satellite altimeter data[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2000, 25(4): 343-347.
[36]
CHENG X H, QI Y Q. Trends of sea level variations in the South China Sea from merged altimetry data[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2007, 57(3/4): 371-382.
[37]
詹金刚, 王勇, 柳林涛. 中国近海海平面季节尺度变化的时频分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(1):36-41.
ZHAN J G, WANG Y, LIU L T. Time-frequency analysis of the inter-seasonal variations of China-neighboring seas level[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(1): 36-41.
[38]
AL-JABERY K, OBAFEMI-AJAYI T, OLBRICHT G, et al. Computational learning approaches to data analytics in biomedical applications[M]. London: Academic Press, 2020.
[39]
ISHIDA K, TSUJIMOTO G, ERCAN A L, et al. Hourly-scale coastal sea level modeling in a changing climate using long short-term memory neural network[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 720: 137613.
[40]
BERGSTRA J, BENGIO Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2012, 13: 281-305.
[41]
WÖPPELMANN G, MARCOS M. Vertical land motion as a key to understanding sea level change and variability[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2016, 54(1): 64-92.
[42]
于振龙, 许东峰, 姚志雄, 等. 基于多变量LSTM神经网络模型的PDO指数预测研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2022, 44(6):58-67.
YU Z L, XU D F, YAO Z X, et al. Research on PDO index prediction based on multivariate LSTM neural network model[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2022, 44(6): 58-67.
[43]
HYNDMAN R J, KOEHLER A B. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2006, 22(4): 679-688.
[44]
CHEN N, HAN G Q, YANG J S. Mean relative sea level rise along the coasts of the China Seas from mid-20th to 21st centuries[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2018, 152: 27-34.
[45]
PARKER A. Relative sea level rise along the coast of China mid-twentieth to end twenty-first centuries[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11: 262.
[46]
ZHOU D X, LIU Y, FENG Y K, et al. Absolute sea level changes along the coast of China from tide gauges, GNSS, and satellite altimetry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2022, 127(9): e2022JC018994.
[47]
QU Y, JEVREJEVA S, JACKSON L P, et al. Coastal sea level rise around the China Seas[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2019, 172: 454-463.
We analyze the sea level rise along the Bohai Sea, the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea, and the South China Sea (the "China Seas") coastline using 25 tide gauge records beginning with Macau in 1925, but with most starting during the 1950s and 60s. The main problem in estimating sea level rise for the period is the lack of vertical land movement (VLM) data for the tide gauge stations. We estimated VLM using satellite altimetry covering the 18 stations with records spanning 1993-2016. The results show that many tide gauge stations, typically in cities, have undergone significant subsidence due to groundwater extraction. After removing the VLM from tide gauge records, the 1993-2016 sea level rise rate is 3.2 +/- 1.1 mm/yr, and 2.9 +/- 0.8 mm/yr over the longer 1980-2016 period. We estimate the steric sea level contribution to be up to 0.9 +/- 0.3 mm/yr, and contributions from ice mass loss from glaciers and ice sheets of up to 1.1 +/- 0.1 mm/yr over the last 60 years. Contributions from VLM range between - 4.5 +/- 1.0 mm/yr and 1.4 +/- 1.3 mm/yr across the stations. Projections of coastal sea level probability distributions under future climate scenarios show that the steric factor is the main contributor under both the RCP 4.5 and High-end RCP 8.5 scenarios except in the upper tails under High-end RCP 8.5 when the Antarctic ice sheet makes the greatest contribution. By 2100 we expect median coastal sea level rises at the stations of 48-61 cm under RCP 4.5, and 84-99 cm under High-end RCP 8.5 scenario.
[48]
CONNOR J T, MARTIN R D, ATLAS L E. Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1994, 5(2): 240-254.
We propose a robust learning algorithm and apply it to recurrent neural networks. This algorithm is based on filtering outliers from the data and then estimating parameters from the filtered data. The filtering removes outliers from both the target function and the inputs of the neural network. The filtering is soft in that some outliers are neither completely rejected nor accepted. To show the need for robust recurrent networks, we compare the predictive ability of least squares estimated recurrent networks on synthetic data and on the Puget Power Electric Demand time series. These investigations result in a class of recurrent neural networks, NARMA(p,q), which show advantages over feedforward neural networks for time series with a moving average component. Conventional least squares methods of fitting NARMA(p,q) neural network models are shown to suffer a lack of robustness towards outliers. This sensitivity to outliers is demonstrated on both the synthetic and real data sets. Filtering the Puget Power Electric Demand time series is shown to automatically remove the outliers due to holidays. Neural networks trained on filtered data are then shown to give better predictions than neural networks trained on unfiltered time series.
[49]
CHUNG J, GULCEHRE C, CHO K H, et al. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling[Z/OL]. arXiv, 2023: 1412.3555. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3555.
[50]
CORTES C, VAPNIK V. Support-vector networks[J]. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273-297.

基金

浙江省财政一般公共预算项目(330000210130313013006)

PDF(2235 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/