陆海差异视角下我国海洋自然保护地关键问题识别与分析

曾江宁, 李国东, 董涵

海洋学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 66-73.

PDF(1225 KB)
PDF(1225 KB)
海洋学研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 66-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.01.005
海洋科技与全球治理

陆海差异视角下我国海洋自然保护地关键问题识别与分析

作者信息 +

Identification and analysis of key issues in China’s marine protected areas from the perspective of land-sea differences

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

陆地与海洋是地球表层两大核心生态系统,共同维系着全球生物多样性,并为包括人类在内的所有生命提供物质基础、气候调节和文明承载等关键服务。本文深入剖析了陆海在空间与生态属性上的本质差异,并探讨了“陆海统筹”理念在保护地建设与管理中的具体应用。研究认为:1)过度强调统一化管理,易忽视区域特殊性,导致生态保护实效不彰,并引发社会经济冲突;2)机械套用陆地生态学与地理学理念来管理海洋保护地,既可能难以实现人海和谐的发展目标,亦可能导致管理上的封闭,阻碍海洋资源的可持续利用。基于此,本文提出差异化管理建议:在“陆海统筹”原则下,科学认知并尊重陆海保护地的统一性与差异性;着力填补海洋观测数据鸿沟,为精准决策提供支撑;构建基于海洋生物迁徙路线的物候或季节性动态管理机制,实施更具弹性的保护策略。

Abstract

Terrestrial and marine ecosystems are the two core ecosystems of the earth’s surface, jointly sustaining global biodiversity and providing critical services such as material foundation, climate regulation, and civilization support for all life including humans. This article analyzes the essential differences between terrestrial and marine systems in spatial and ecological attributes, and explores the specific application of the “integrated land-sea coordination” concept in the construction and management of protected areas. The research concludes that: 1) Overemphasis on unified management tends to neglect regional particularities, leading to ineffective ecological protection and triggering socio-economic conflicts. 2) Mechanistically applying terrestrial ecological and geographical concepts to marine protected areas management may not only hinder the achievement of harmonious human-sea development goals, but also cause management closure, obstructing the sustainable use of marine resources. Based on this, this paper proposes differentiated management recommendations: Under the principle of “integrated land-sea coordination,” scientifically recognize and respect both the unity and differences of terrestrial and marine protected areas; strive to fill the marine observation data gap to support precise decision-making; establish phenological or seasonal dynamic management mechanisms based on marine species migration routes to implement more flexible conservation strategies.

关键词

自然保护地 / 陆地生态系统 / 海洋生态系统 / 海洋自然保护地 / 空间分异 / 差异化管理 / 动态管理机制 / 陆海统筹

Key words

nature reserve / terrestrial ecosystem / marine ecosystem / marine protected areas / spatial differentiation / differentiated management / dynamic management mechanism / integrated land-sea coordination

引用本文

导出引用
曾江宁, 李国东, 董涵. 陆海差异视角下我国海洋自然保护地关键问题识别与分析[J]. 海洋学研究. 2026, 44(1): 66-73 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.01.005
ZENG Jiangning, LI Guodong, DONG Han. Identification and analysis of key issues in China’s marine protected areas from the perspective of land-sea differences[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences. 2026, 44(1): 66-73 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.01.005
中图分类号: P76;S759.9;X36   

参考文献

[1]
谭乾权, 张芳. 全球野生动物种群数量50年锐减七成多[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(12):5-8.
TAN Q Q, ZHANG F. The global wildlife population declines by over 70% in 50 years[J]. Ecological Economy, 2024, 40(12): 5-8.
[2]
MCRAE L, FREEMAN R, GELDMANN J, et al. A global indicator of utilized wildlife populations: Regional trends and the impact of management[J]. One Earth, 2022, 5(4): 422-433.
[3]
BAN N C, DARLING E S, GURNEY G G, et al. Effects of management objectives and rules on marine conservation outcomes[J]. Conservation Biology, 2023, 37(6): e14156.
[4]
GRORUD-COLVERT K, SULLIVAN-STACK J, ROBERTS C, et al. The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean[J]. Science, 2021, 373(6560): eabf0861.
[5]
FAN H Z, HUANG M P, CHEN Y H, et al. Conservation priorities for global marine biodiversity across multiple dimensions[J]. National Science Review, 2022, 10(6): nwac241.
[6]
卢嘉颖, 曹玲, 曾聪. 海洋保护区间生态连通性研究进展及思考[J]. 自然保护地, 2024, 4(4):107-121.
LU J Y, CAO L, ZENG C. Ecological connectivity of marine protected areas: An overview[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(4): 107-121.
[7]
江南, 徐卫华, 刘增力. 我国自然保护地对海洋生物多样性的保护现状[J]. 国家公园:中英文, 2024, 2(2):72-80.
JIANG N, XU W H, LIU Z L. Current status of sea-related protected areas and marine biodiversity conservation in China[J]. National Park, 2024, 2(2): 72-80.
[8]
MOUILLOT D, VELEZ L, ALBOUY C, et al. The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 9007.
The global network of protected areas has rapidly expanded in the past decade and is expected to cover at least 30% of land and sea by 2030 to halt biodiversity erosion. Yet, the distribution of protected areas is highly heterogeneous on Earth and the social-environmental preconditions enabling or hindering protected area establishment remain poorly understood. Here, using fourteen socioeconomic and environmental factors, we characterize the multidimensional niche of terrestrial and marine protected areas, which we use to accurately establish, at the global scale, whether a particular location has preconditions favourable for paestablishment. We reveal that protected areas, particularly the most restrictive ones, over-aggregate where human development and the number of non-governmental organizations are high. Based on the spatial distribution of vertebrates and the likelihood to convert non-protected areas into strictly protected areas, we identify 'potential' versus 'unrealistic' conservation gains on land and sea, which we define as areas of high vertebrate diversity that are, respectively, favourable and unfavourable to protected area establishment. Where protected areas are unrealistic, alternative strategies such as other effective area-based conservation measures or privately protected areas, could deliver conservation outcomes.© 2024. The Author(s).
[9]
MICHAELSEN P, SUNDSTRÖM A, JAGERS S C. Mass support for conserving 30% of the Earth by 2030: Experi-mental evidence from five continents[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025, 122(35): e2503355122.
[10]
D’AGATA S, MAINA J M. Climate change reduces the conservation benefits of tropical coastal ecosystems[J]. One Earth, 2022, 5(11): 1228-1238.
[11]
江南, 黄琪琦, 龙旭, 等. 我国海洋保护地建设面临的困难及应对措施[J]. 国家公园:中英文, 2025, 3(9):556-565.
JIANG N, HUANG Q Q, LONG X, et al. Barriers and countermeasures in developing marine protected areas: An empirical study from China[J]. National Park, 2025, 3(9): 556-565.
[12]
MAINI B, BLYTHE J L, DARLING E S, et al. Charting the value and limits of other effective conservation measures (OECMs) for marine conservation: A Delphi study[J]. Marine Policy, 2023, 147: 105350.
[13]
傅秀梅, 王长云, 邵长伦, 等. 中国海洋药用生物濒危珍稀物种及其保护[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 39(4):719-728,734.
FU X M, WANG C Y, SHAO C L, et al. Endangered and rare species of marine medicinal organisms and their protection in China[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2009, 39(4): 719-728, 734.
[14]
ZOU J Y, JIN X S, SHAN X J, et al. Whether the summer fishing moratorium can improve the status of fisheries resources in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(19): e38100.
[15]
ZHANG L, MA S W, TANG Y, et al. Acceptance of the summer fishing moratorium among small-scale fishers in China[J]. Marine Policy, 2025, 173: 106556.
[16]
银利强, 唐浩, 许柳雄, 等. 栅型兼捕减少装置的规格和倾角对网囊水动力及形态的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2024, 48(3):196-206.
YIN L Q, TANG H, XU L X, et al. Effects of size and grid angle of sorting grid on the hydrodynamic performance and shape of trawl codend[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2024, 48(3): 196-206.
[17]
柳金昊, 冯晓明, 吕一河, 等. 中国国土空间生态安全格局发展历程和特点[J]. 科技导报, 2025, 43(14):24-33.
摘要
国土空间生态安全格局是为保障生态安全,在国土空间内进行生态保护和生态修复的规划和布局。分析中国国土空间生态安全格局的发展历程和特点对推动国土空间生态安全格局构建与优化具有重大意义。梳理了中国国土空间生态安全格局理念演进的不同阶段,明确不同阶段的标志性事件,分析了当前国土空间生态安全构建的特点,指出支撑国土空间生态安全格局建设的重点。随着社会经济的发展和对生态安全理论认知的逐步深入,中国国土空间生态安全格局布局在针对单一生态问题进行修复、奠定“两屏三带”国土空间生态安全格局的基础上,开始构建以“三区四带”为主体的国土空间生态安全格局;当前中国国土空间生态安全格局构建在空间上更加注重地理单元的功能完整性,在要素上重视山水林田湖草一体化治理,在布局上强调生态、生产、生活空间协调。未来需要加强已经实施生态工程与国土空间生态安全格局构建的衔接,在气候变化和人类活动强度增加的背景下,仍然在科学规划生态安全格局并量化效益、科学应对风险、加强动态监测和协调管理、积极引导公众参与等方面着力,为国土空间生态安全格局构建提供坚实的支持。
LIU J H, FENG X M, Y H, et al. The development and characteristics of China’s territorial ecological security pattern[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2025, 43(14): 24-33.
[18]
全永波. 全球海洋生态环境治理的区域化演进与对策[J]. 太平洋学报, 2020, 28(5):81-91.
QUAN Y B. Regional evolution and countermeasures of global marine ecological environment governance[J]. Pacific Journal, 2020, 28(5): 81-91.
[19]
刘卫先. 陆海统筹在自然生态保护法中的实现[J]. 东方法学, 2022(3):85-95.
LIU W X. Realization of land and sea coordination in natural ecological protection law[J]. Oriental Law, 2022(3): 85-95.
[20]
张忍顺. 苏北黄河三角洲及滨海平原的成陆过程[J]. 地理学报, 1984, 39(2):173-184.
摘要
历史时期的黄河以善决善徙闻名于世。其尾闾入海路线大致可归结为三条。或北道由天津附近入渤海,历时二千四百余年;或中路趋山东利津入海,历时一千四百余年;或南线出云梯关入黄海,历七百余年。
ZHANG R S. Land-forming history of the Huanghe River delta and coastal plain of north Jiangsu[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1984, 39(2): 173-184.
[21]
LIANG X X, CHEN S, MA B S, et al. Changes of tectonic regime of the East China Sea Shelf Basin since Mesozoic: Insights from the Tiantai slope belt, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2024, 259: 105900.
[22]
方银霞, 李家彪. 联合国“海洋十年”深海领域大科学计划进展和中国的参与——以“数字化深海典型生境”大科学计划为例[J]. 太平洋学报, 2024, 32(12):54-66.
FANG Y X, LI J B. Progress of UN Ocean Decade Programme on deep sea and China’s participation—A case of Digital Deep-sea Typical Habitats Programme[J]. Pacific Journal, 2024, 32(12): 54-66.
[23]
XING Q W, YU H Q, WANG H. Global mapping and evolution of persistent fronts in Large Marine Ecosystems over the past 40 years[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 4090.
Ocean fronts, characterized by narrow zones with sharp changes in water properties, are vital hotspots for ecosystem services and key regulators of regional and global climates. Global change is reshaping the distribution of material and energy in the ocean; however, it remains unclear how fronts have varied in the last few decades. Here, we present a global, fine-scale digital atlas of persistent fronts around Large Marine Ecosystems and demonstrate significant global increases in both their occurrence and intensity. In subtropical regions (around boundary currents and upwelling systems) and polar regions, persistent frontal occurrence and intensity are rapidly increasing, while in tropical regions, they remain stable or slightly decrease. These enhancements may be respectively related to changes in boundary currents, upwelling, and sea ice retreat. This spatially heterogeneous trend holds important implications for the redistribution of front-related ecosystem services and air-sea interactions but has not been captured by representative high-resolution climate projections models or observation-assimilated ocean models.© 2024. The Author(s).
[24]
BEASLEY J C, OLSON Z H, DEVAULT T L. Carrion cycling in food webs: Comparisons among terrestrial and marine ecosystems[J]. Oikos, 2012, 121(7): 1021-1026.
[25]
RIBERA D’ALCALÀ M. Similarities, differences and mechanisms of climate impact on terrestrial vs. marine ecosystems[J]. Nature Conservation, 2019, 34: 505-523.
Comparisons between terrestrial and marine ecosystems are generally not in the main stream of scientific literature even though Webb (2012) listed several points for which the transfer of knowledge and concepts related to one or to the other system would benefit our understanding of both. Even sharing this view, the leading hypothesis behind this contribution is that the pelagic system, where the dominant biotic component by number and biomass is microscopic, has specific features which strongly differentiate it from the above-the-surface terrestrial systems. Due to this, climate change, i.e. changes in temperature, precipitation and most importantly in the dynamics of the two fluid media, atmosphere and ocean, act with different mechanisms which prevents proceeding with analogies in many cases. In addition, the non-linearity of most of the processes and responses to perturbations requires, in order to obtain reliable forecasts or hindcasts, a detailed analysis of the path followed by the system which is normally overlooked in the step-change simulations or projections.
[26]
RAY G C. Chapter 4: Ecological diversity in coastal zones and oceans[M]// WILSON E O, PETER F M. Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1988. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219271/.
[27]
刘瑞玉. 中国海洋生物名录[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
LIU R Y. List of marine organisms in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
[28]
RAMIREZ-LLODRA E, BRANDT A, DANOVARO R, et al. Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem[J]. Biogeosciences, 2010, 7(9): 2851-2899.
. The deep sea, the largest biome on Earth, has a series of characteristics that make this environment both distinct from other marine and land ecosystems and unique for the entire planet. This review describes these patterns and processes, from geological settings to biological processes, biodiversity and biogeographical patterns. It concludes with a brief discussion of current threats from anthropogenic activities to deep-sea habitats and their fauna. Investigations of deep-sea habitats and their fauna began in the late 19th century. In the intervening years, technological developments and stimulating discoveries have promoted deep-sea research and changed our way of understanding life on the planet. Nevertheless, the deep sea is still mostly unknown and current discovery rates of both habitats and species remain high. The geological, physical and geochemical settings of the deep-sea floor and the water column form a series of different habitats with unique characteristics that support specific faunal communities. Since 1840, 28 new habitats/ecosystems have been discovered from the shelf break to the deep trenches and discoveries of new habitats are still happening in the early 21st century. However, for most of these habitats the global area covered is unknown or has been only very roughly estimated; an even smaller – indeed, minimal – proportion has actually been sampled and investigated. We currently perceive most of the deep-sea ecosystems as heterotrophic, depending ultimately on the flux on organic matter produced in the overlying surface ocean through photosynthesis. The resulting strong food limitation thus shapes deep-sea biota and communities, with exceptions only in reducing ecosystems such as inter alia hydrothermal vents or cold seeps. Here, chemoautolithotrophic bacteria play the role of primary producers fuelled by chemical energy sources rather than sunlight. Other ecosystems, such as seamounts, canyons or cold-water corals have an increased productivity through specific physical processes, such as topographic modification of currents and enhanced transport of particles and detrital matter. Because of its unique abiotic attributes, the deep sea hosts a specialized fauna. Although there are no phyla unique to deep waters, at lower taxonomic levels the composition of the fauna is distinct from that found in the upper ocean. Amongst other characteristic patterns, deep-sea species may exhibit either gigantism or dwarfism, related to the decrease in food availability with depth. Food limitation on the seafloor and water column is also reflected in the trophic structure of heterotrophic deep-sea communities, which are adapted to low energy availability. In most of these heterotrophic habitats, the dominant megafauna is composed of detritivores, while filter feeders are abundant in habitats with hard substrata (e.g. mid-ocean ridges, seamounts, canyon walls and coral reefs). Chemoautotrophy through symbiotic relationships is dominant in reducing habitats. Deep-sea biodiversity is among of the highest on the planet, mainly composed of macro and meiofauna, with high evenness. This is true for most of the continental margins and abyssal plains with hot spots of diversity such as seamounts or cold-water corals. However, in some ecosystems with particularly \"extreme\" physicochemical processes (e.g. hydrothermal vents), biodiversity is low but abundance and biomass are high and the communities are dominated by a few species. Two large-scale diversity patterns have been discussed for deep-sea benthic communities. First, a unimodal relationship between diversity and depth is observed, with a peak at intermediate depths (2000–3000 m), although this is not universal and particular abiotic processes can modify the trend. Secondly, a poleward trend of decreasing diversity has been discussed, but this remains controversial and studies with larger and more robust data sets are needed. Because of the paucity in our knowledge of habitat coverage and species composition, biogeographic studies are mostly based on regional data or on specific taxonomic groups. Recently, global biogeographic provinces for the pelagic and benthic deep ocean have been described, using environmental and, where data were available, taxonomic information. This classification described 30 pelagic provinces and 38 benthic provinces divided into 4 depth ranges, as well as 10 hydrothermal vent provinces. One of the major issues faced by deep-sea biodiversity and biogeographical studies is related to the high number of species new to science that are collected regularly, together with the slow description rates for these new species. Taxonomic coordination at the global scale is particularly difficult, but is essential if we are to analyse large diversity and biogeographic trends.
[29]
杜建国, 叶观琼, 周秋麟, 等. 近海海洋生态连通性研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(21):6923-6933.
DU J G, YE G Q, ZHOU Q L, et al. Progress and prospects of coastal ecological connectivity studies[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(21): 6923-6933.
[30]
LENOIR J, BERTRAND R, COMTE L, et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(8): 1044-1059.
[31]
HAZEN E L, SCALES K L, MAXWELL S M, et al. A dynamic ocean management tool to reduce bycatch and support sustainable fisheries[J]. Science Advances, 2018, 4(5): eaar3001.
Dynamic management approaches protect endangered bycatch species but with much greater efficiency than existing static closures.
[32]
MAXWELL S M, HAZEN E L, LEWISON R L, et al. Dynamic ocean management: Defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean[J]. Marine Policy, 2015, 58: 42-50.
[33]
白玲, 于国旭, 张朝晖, 等. 渤黄海区核心价值与重要保护范围划定探讨[J]. 国家公园:中英文, 2024, 2(3):198-207.
BAI L, YU G X, ZHANG Z H, et al. Core values and boundary delineation of the critical protected area of Bohai and Yellow Sea area[J]. Natinonal Park, 2024, 2(3): 198-207.
[34]
沈刚, 袁钢涛, 王欣凯, 等. 浙江省海岸带及海洋空间自然保护地分布与格局分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报:社会科学版, 2025, 24(3):67-73.
SHEN G, YUAN G T, WANG X K, et al. Analysis on the distribution and pattern of protected areas in the coastal and marine space of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University: Social Sciences, 2025, 24(3): 67-73.
[35]
张朝晖. 海洋类国家公园:挑战、对策和展望[J]. 国家公园:中英文, 2024, 2(2):67-71.
ZHANG Z H. Challenges, suggestions, and prospects of marine national parks in China[J]. National Park, 2024, 2(2): 67-71.
[36]
张晏瑲, 郭金华. 我国海洋保护区建设过程中的机制挑战与完善建议[J]. 南海学刊, 2025, 11(1):54-63.
ZHANG Y Q, GUO J H. The challenges of mechanisms in the construction of marine protected areas in China and suggestions for improvement[J]. The Journal of South China Sea Studies, 2025, 11(1): 54-63.
[37]
曾江宁, 曾旭, 叶观琼, 等. 基于一体化战略的长三角海洋保护地建设历程与未来趋势[J]. 自然保护地, 2021, 1(1):60-71.
ZENG J N, ZENG X, YE G Q, et al. The development process and future trend of marine protected areas in Yangtze River Delta based on the integration strategy[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2021, 1(1): 60-71.
[38]
CUSHING D H. Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: An update of the match/mismatch hypothesis[M]//BLAXTER J H S, SOUTHWARD A J. Advances in marine biology: Volume 26. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990: 249-293.
[39]
段克, 王修林. 适应“昆明—蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架”目标的中国海洋保护区政策研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(8):1154-1167.
DUAN K, WANG X L. Research on China’s marine protected areas policy based on Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework 2030 targets[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(8): 1154-1167.
[40]
谈萧, 苏雁. 陆海统筹视野下海洋保护地法律制度研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:社会科学版, 2021(1):79-89.
TAN X, SU Y. A research on the legal system of marine protected areas under land-sea coordination[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China: Social Sciences, 2021(1): 79-89.
[41]
蔡晓梅, 苏杨, 吴必虎, 等. 生态文明建设背景下中国自然保护地发展的理论思考与创新实践[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(4):839-861.
摘要
建立以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系,从改革角度看是贯彻习近平生态文明思想的重大举措,从国土空间治理角度看是做实生态建设的核心载体和维护其在国家生态安全中的首要地位。为了更好地理解与诠释生态文明建设背景下中国自然保护地的发展规律及其背后的驱动因素,我们邀请了七位来自生态文明和国家公园相关领域的知名专家,就自然保护地的以下方面进行了探讨:生态文明建设、人地关系、人与自然的冲突和共生转换机制、自然保护地的治理体系和中国治理体系对全球生态文明建设的贡献、自然资源资产产权制度、自然保护地的日常管理与监督、自然保护地的生态补偿和特许经营等。主要结论有:(1)只有生态文明体制才能真正使各地地方政府处理好自然保护地的保护与发展关系,而国家公园是生态文明体制改革中整体进展最快、制度改革最系统的领域。(2)要实现“最严格的保护”,在关注自然保护地“地”的同时,强调在“因地制宜”“恋地主义原真性”等视角下考虑“人”(尤其本地居民)在生态系统中的功能和参与方式。(3)自然保护地人与自然冲突的制度成因主要源自不同层级政府之间的利益结构冲突。解决冲突、实现人与自然共生,需要优化治理体系尤其是调整各级政府的责权利制度,重构利益维度,形成利益共同体。(4)在自然保护地治理体系中,要处理好多元主体的各类关系,需要在统一的管理目标下对不同利益主体责权利进行统筹协调与高效配置,建构自然保护地共治格局与多元共治体系。(5)全球自然保护治理存在资本逻辑与生态逻辑、自然保护地与人居系统、自然保护目标与全球执行力之间的深层次矛盾。新时代中国特色社会主义的制度优势和几千年积淀形成的“人与天调”的文化传统能为全球生态文明建设贡献中国智慧。(6)针对自然保护地体系建设需求及其在国土空间规划中的定位,进一步优化自然资源资产产权制度,探索有利于处理保护与发展关系的国土空间用途管制制度。(7)国家机构改革前,自然保护地存在“九龙治水”的破碎化管理问题。机构改革后有专门部门分别对自然保护地进行日常综合管理和监督执法,实现了管理与监督的统一、规范与有序。(8)要持久做到生态保护第一,就必须普遍实现两山转化,尤其是在市场经济条件下实现两山转化。国家公园特许经营制度是一种市场化、多元化的生态补偿路径,也是绿色发展的一种有效方式,需要用多种方式积极进行政府特许经营和品牌特许经营的探索。
CAI X M, SU Y, WU B H, et al. Theoretical debates and innovative practices of the development of China’s nature protected area under the background of ecological civilization construction[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2022YFF0802203)

PDF(1225 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/