由于全球大陆边缘地貌和地质特征的复杂性,且《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)第76条对200海里以外大陆架外部界限划定的规则存在一定的模糊性,导致大陆架外部界限的划定极其复杂。根据《公约》设立的大陆架界限委员会(以下简称委员会)负责审议沿海国提交的划界案并给出建议,委员会在外大陆架划界方面发挥重要作用。截止2012年12月底,委员会一共收到沿海国65份划界案,目前已完成其中18份划界案的审议工作并给出了建议。本文系统分析了各委员会建议摘要,对委员会在审议划界案时采用的划界原则、审议的关键技术问题等做了综合分析总结,以便为我国今后外大陆架划界和积极应对侵害我国海洋权益的他国划界主张提供参考和借鉴。
Abstract
The geomorphology and geological complexity around the global continental margin, and the ambiguity of the rules for the delineation of the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles according to the Convention Article 76, led to the delineation of the outer limits of the continental shelf extremely complex. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf that set up by the Convention is responsible for the consideration of submissions submitted by coastal states and providing the recommendations. Therefore the Commission plays an important role in the delimitation of the outer continental shelf. As of the end of December 2012, the Commission has received 65 submissions, and has completed the consideration of 18 submissions. Some critical issues such as the basic principles, the scientific technique adopted by the Commission during these submissions' consideration were systematically analyzed and summarized. These summary and knowledge can be use to provide the useful reference for our future delimitation of the outer continental shelf and actively respond to other country's claims which infringed on our maritime rights and interests.
关键词
《联合国海洋法公约》 /
外大陆架 /
划界案 /
大陆架界限委员会 /
建议摘要
Key words
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea /
outer continental shelf /
submission /
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf /
recommendations summary
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] The Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Chinese-English)[M]. Beijing: Ocean Press, 1996.
联合国第三次海洋法会议.联合国海洋法公约(汉英)[M]. 北京:海洋出版社,1996.
[2] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Submissions through the Secretary-General of the UN to the CLCS Pursuant to Article 76 Paragraph 8 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2013. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm.
[3] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Scientific and Technical Guidelines of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 1999. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/171/08/IMG/N9917108.pdf.
[4] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Partial Submission Made by Ireland[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2007. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/irl05/irl_rec.pdf.
[5] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Submission Made by Japan[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2012. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/jpn08/com_sumrec_jpn_fin.pdf.
[6] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Submission Made by UK in Respect of Ascension Island[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2010. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/gbr08/gbr_asc_isl_rec_summ.pdf.
[7] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Revised Submission Made by Barbados[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2012. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/brb_10rev2011/brb_10rev2011_summary_recommendations.pdf.
[8] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Revised Submission Made by Indonesia in Respect of the area North West of Sumatra[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2011. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/idn08/Summary Recommendations for Indonesia.pdf
[9] LÜ Wen-zheng, ZHANG Hai-wen, FANG Yin-xia, et al. Continental Shelf Limits: The Scientific and Legal Interface (in Chinese)[M]. Beijing: Ocean Press, 2012.
吕文正,张海文,方银霞,等.大陆架外部界限-科学与法律的交汇[M]. 北京:海洋出版社,2012.
[10] SYMONDS P A, COFFIN M F, TAFT G, et al. Ridge issues[C]//COOK P J, CARLETON C M ed. Continental Shelf Limits: the Scientific and Legal interface. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 285-307.
[11] WANG W G. Geological structures of ridges with relation to the definition of three types of seafloor highs stipulated in Article 76[J]. Acta Oceanol Sin, 2011,30(5):125-137.
[12] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Revised Submission Made by Australia[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2008.http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/aus04/Aus_Recommendations_FINAL.pdf
[13] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). Summary of the Recommendations of the CLCS in Regard to the Joint Submission Made by France, Ireland, Spain, and UK in Respect of the Area of the Celtic Sea and the Bay of Biscay[R/OL]. New York: CLCS, 2009. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/frgbires06/fisu_clcs_recommendations_summary2009.pdf.
基金
国家海洋公益性行业科研专项经费资助项目(201205003,200805078)
PDF(3817 KB)
