
人工智能海浪预报的发展与挑战
Progress and challenges of artificial intelligence wave forecasting
海浪是海洋中最为重要的现象之一,快速准确的海浪预报对于保障海上生产、生活安全具有重要意义。该文回顾了海浪预报方法的发展历程,包括传统统计预报、数值模式预报以及目前快速发展的人工智能预报。基于人工智能的海浪预报模型表现出计算速度快、预报精度自适应优化等优势,已经开始从研究阶段逐步应用于实际海浪预报业务之中,但同时该方法也存在预报要素有限、极端海况预报值偏低以及预报泛化能力弱的局限。该文根据人工智能海浪预报的特点,提出了人工智能海浪预报目前亟需解决的观测数据高效利用、先验知识引入、人工智能模型安全性与泛化能力提升等关键科学技术问题。
Waves are one of the most important phenomena in the ocean. The accurate and quick updated wave forecasting is of crucial significance for ensuring marine activities safety. The development of wave forecast is presented, including the traditional statistical wave forecasting methods, numerical wave prediction models, and the rapidly developing artificial intelligence (AI) wave forecasting methods. Currently, AI wave forecast models have been demonstrated unique advantages in terms of computational efficiency and adaptive forecasting accuracy, and they are gradually being applied in practical wave forecasting operations, transitioning from the research stage. However, they also have limitations, including limited forecasting elements, underestimation of extreme wave conditions, and weak forecasting generalization ability. Based on the characteristics of AI wave prediction, key scientific and technological issues that need to be addressed in current AI wave forecasting are proposed. These include efficient utilization of observational data, incorporation of prior physical knowledge, and enhancement of AI model safety and generalization ability.
人工智能 / 海浪预报 / 发展历程 / 数值模式 / 智能预报 / 数据驱动 / 难点挑战 / 未来趋势
artificial intelligence (AI) / ocean wave forecasting / development course / numerical model / intelligent forecasting / data-driven / difficulties and challenges / future trend
[1] |
管长龙. 我国海浪理论及预报研究的回顾与展望[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 2000, 30(4):549-556.
|
[2] |
In this study, global satellite data were analyzed to determine trends in oceanic wind speed and significant wave height over the 33-year period from 1985 to 2018. The analysis uses an extensive database obtained from 31 satellite missions comprising three types of instruments-altimeters, radiometers, and scatterometers. The analysis shows small increases in mean wind speed and significant wave height over this period, with larger increases in extreme conditions (90th percentiles). The largest increases occur in the Southern Ocean. Confidence in the results is strengthened because the wind speed trends are confirmed by all three satellite systems. An extensive set of sensitivity analyses confirms that both the mean and 90th percentile trends are robust, with only small impacts caused by satellite calibration and sampling patterns.Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
Studies of climate change typically consider measurements or predictions of temperature over extended periods of time. Climate, however, is much more than temperature. Over the oceans, changes in wind speed and the surface gravity waves generated by such winds play an important role. We used a 23-year database of calibrated and validated satellite altimeter measurements to investigate global changes in oceanic wind speed and wave height over this period. We find a general global trend of increasing values of wind speed and, to a lesser degree, wave height, over this period. The rate of increase is greater for extreme events as compared to the mean condition.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
屈远, 高志一, 蔡靖泽, 等. 数值模型和智能模型的海浪预报能力比较[J]. 海洋预报, 2022, 39(5):17-26.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
许富祥, 许林之. 海浪预报方法综述(一)[J]. 海洋预报, 1989(3):33-43.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
文圣常. 普遍风浪谱及其应用[J]. 山东海洋学院学报, 1960:15-43.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
文圣常. 我在海浪理论及应用领域的研究工作[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 1996(2):61.
|
[20] |
汪炳祥. 新型风浪谱及其应用[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1962(Z2):142-160.
|
[21] |
汪炳祥. 风浪谱的形式的再探讨[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1964(1): 23-37.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
关孟儒. 台风波浪推算方法的探讨[J]. 华东水利学院学报, 1981(2):17-36.
|
[26] |
SWAMP Group. Wave dynamics (Book reviews: Ocean wave modeling)[J]. Science, 1985, 229.DOI:10.1126/science.229.4711.377.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
WAMDI Group. The WAM model—a third generation ocean wave prediction model[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1988, 18(12): 1775-1810.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
Many underlying relationships among data in several areas of science and engineering, e.g., computer vision, molecular chemistry, molecular biology, pattern recognition, and data mining, can be represented in terms of graphs. In this paper, we propose a new neural network model, called graph neural network (GNN) model, that extends existing neural network methods for processing the data represented in graph domains. This GNN model, which can directly process most of the practically useful types of graphs, e.g., acyclic, cyclic, directed, and undirected, implements a function tau(G,n) is an element of IR(m) that maps a graph G and one of its nodes n into an m-dimensional Euclidean space. A supervised learning algorithm is derived to estimate the parameters of the proposed GNN model. The computational cost of the proposed algorithm is also considered. Some experimental results are shown to validate the proposed learning algorithm, and to demonstrate its generalization capabilities.
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
许立兵, 王安喜, 汪纯阳, 等. 基于机器学习的海洋环境预报订正方法研究[J]. 海洋通报, 2020, 39(6): 695-704.
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
张新宇, 石爱国, 周波, 等. 一种海浪谱预报的新模式[J]. 中国航海, 2015, 38(2):118-121.
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |