
Progress in the protection and restoration of China’s oyster reefs: The practice of oyster reef restoration in Ruian
WU Xiaowen, XUE Feng, CAI Jingbo
Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 73-80.
Progress in the protection and restoration of China’s oyster reefs: The practice of oyster reef restoration in Ruian
Oyster reefs are one of the important coastal habitats. Over the past century, oyster reefs have been severely degraded worldwide. However, with the gradual recognition of the irreplaceable ecosystem service functions of oyster reefs, the significance of oyster reef conservation and restoration has become prominent in the global efforts to restore and protect degraded coastal ecosystems. This study systematically collects and collates the distribution information of natural oyster reefs and artificially restored oyster reefs in China, summarizes the main work and achievements in the field of oyster reef conservation and restoration in China since the beginning of this century. Combined with the author’s practical experience in the Wenzhou coastal zone protection and restoration project (oyster reef), the technical process of restoration is described in detail, with emphasis on the design and structure of the inclined support composite oyster reef and the artificial seedling attachment technology used in the restoration project. Corresponding suggestions are put forward, which can provide references for future oyster reef conservation and restoration work.
oyster reefs / conservation and restoration / restoration technologies / comprehensive management and maintenance / restoration practices
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
吴海玲, 吴旗韬, 廖开怀, 等. 全球养殖牡蛎碳汇能力评估[J]. 水产养殖, 2023, 44(10):75-80.
|
[6] |
杨心愿. 祥云湾海洋牧场人工牡蛎礁群落特征及其生态效应[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院海洋研究所), 2019.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
大自然保护协会(TNC). 牡蛎礁生态修复技术[R/OL].(2020-05-07) [2025-01-20].https://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/bmdt/202005/P020200507510383645920.pdf.
The Nature Conservancy. Oyster reef ecological restoration technology[R]. (2020-05-07) [2025-01-20].https://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/bmdt/202005/P020200507510383645920.pdf.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
范昌福, 裴艳东, 田立柱, 等. 渤海湾西部浅海区活牡蛎礁调查结果及资源保护建议[J]. 地质通报, 2010, 29(5): 660-667.
|
[12] |
徐晓甫, 曾祥茜, 李英, 等. 天津大神堂海洋牧场影响新生牡蛎因素初探[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2024, 43(2):70-77.
|
[13] |
全为民, 张云岭, 齐遵利, 等. 河北唐山曹妃甸-乐亭海域自然牡蛎礁分布及生态意义[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(3):1142-1152.
|
[14] |
张贝叶. 黄河口南侧牡蛎礁种群结构和人工牡蛎礁集鱼庇护效果研究[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2023.
|
[15] |
王沈同, 王威, 丛日浩, 等. 黄河三角洲飞雁滩牡蛎礁自然现状评估[J]. 渔业研究, 2025, 47(3):261-269.
|
[16] |
全为民, 周为峰, 马春艳, 等. 江苏海门蛎岈山牡蛎礁生态现状评价[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23):7749-7757.
|
[17] |
张忍顺, 王艳红, 张正龙, 等. 江苏小庙洪牡蛎礁的地貌特征及演化[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2007, 38(3):259-265.
|
[18] |
徐起浩. 福建深沪湾晚更新世古牡蛎滩的发育与留存古环境[J]. 海洋科学, 2002, 26(4):58-62.
|
[19] |
大自然保护协会(TNC). 中国牡蛎礁栖息地保护与修复研究报告[R/OL]. (2022-06-09) [2025-01-20].https://tnc.org.cn/content/details27_732.html.
The Nature Conservancy. Research report on the protection and restoration of oyster reef habitats in China[R/OL]. (2022-06-09) [2025-01-20].https://tnc.org.cn/content/details27_732.html.
|
[20] |
孙万胜, 温国义, 白明, 等. 天津大神堂浅海活牡蛎礁区生物资源状况调查分析[J]. 河北渔业, 2014(9):23-26,76.
|
[21] |
全为民, 安传光, 马春艳, 等. 江苏小庙洪牡蛎礁大型底栖动物多样性及群落结构[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2012, 43(5):992-1000.
|
[22] |
俞鸣同, 藤井昭二, 坂本亨. 福建深沪湾牡蛎礁的成因分析[J]. 海洋通报, 2001, 20(5):24-30.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
大自然保护协会. 拯救牡蛎礁: 亚太地区的牡蛎礁修复工作[R/OL]. (2020-08-06) [2025-02-10].https://www.tnc.org.cn/content/details29_711.html.
The Nature Conservancy. Saving oyster reefs: Oyster reef restoration work in the Asia-Pacific Region[R/OL]. (2020-08-06) [2025-02-10].https://www.tnc.org.cn/content/details29_711.html.
|
[26] |
自然资源部海洋预警监测司. 牡蛎礁生态减灾修复技术手册[M/OL]. (2024-11-01) [2025-01-20].https://m.waitang.com/report/73320022.html.
Marine Early Warning and Monitoring Division, Ministry of Natural Resources. Technical manual for ecological disaster reduction and restoration of oyster reefs[M/OL]. (2024-11-01) [2025-01-20].https://m.waitang.com/report/73320022.html.
|
[27] |
施利燕, 全为民, 陈亚瞿. 长江口导堤人工牡蛎礁的环境价值和生境价值评估[C]// 中国海洋湖沼学会第九次全国会员代表大会暨学术研讨会论文摘要汇编.上海,2007:218.
|
[28] |
侯润. 祥云湾海洋牧场牡蛎礁构建效果评估[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2022.
|
[29] |
刘琦, 姜伟行, 陈丽芝, 等. 浙江健跳港牡蛎礁的幼体补充量和附着底物筛选[J]. 生物资源, 2023, 45(4):375-381.
|
[30] |
施文静, 张文考, 陈丽芝, 等. 浙江省健跳港蛎江滩牡蛎多样性和资源量的时空变化[J]. 海洋渔业, 2023, 45(3):291-301.
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
范瑞良, 晁敏, 任国平, 等. 底物中碳酸钙含量对太平洋牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)幼虫附着的诱导效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(4):1009-1013.
为探讨底物中钙含量对牡蛎幼虫附着的诱导效应,本研究设计2因子随机区组实验,检验底物碳酸钙含量(4个处理水平:5%、20%、40%和60%)和海水中牡蛎幼虫丰度(低处理组:1 ind·mL<sup>-1</sup>, 高处理组:7~8 ind·mL<sup>-1</sup>)对实验底物上太平洋牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)稚贝附着效果(密度和壳高)的影响。结果表明:钙含量和海水中牡蛎幼虫丰度均显著影响实验底物上附着牡蛎稚贝的密度(P<0.05),钙含量对附着稚贝壳高的影响不显著(P>0.05),幼虫丰度显著影响附着稚贝的壳高(P<0.05);在相同牡蛎浮游幼虫丰度下,20%碳酸钙处理组对牡蛎幼虫附着的诱导能力最大,显著高于60%处理组(P<0.05),5%和40%处理组的诱导能力介于中间;在碳酸钙含量相同情况下,高牡蛎幼虫丰度处理组中实验底物上牡蛎稚贝附着量显著高于低幼虫丰度处理组(P<0.05),而平均壳高却表现为高幼虫丰度处理组<低幼虫丰度处理组(P<0.05)。
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |