Seasonal variability and its influencing factors of ocean bottom pressure in the Arabian Sea

ZHANG Kun, ZHANG Tao, WU Binjie, ZHANG Deng, ZHENG Hua, DING Ruibin

Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 83-92.

PDF(4461 KB)
PDF(4461 KB)
Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 83-92. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.01.007

Seasonal variability and its influencing factors of ocean bottom pressure in the Arabian Sea

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The study of ocean bottom pressure (OBP) is great significance for understanding the mechanisms of sea level budget changes and deep ocean circulation. Based on 23 years of OBP data observed by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites, this study systematically reveals the spatiotemporal characteristics and mechanism of OBP variations in the Arabian Sea. There is a strong OBP oscillation center in the central area of the Arabian Sea. The OBP changes throughout the region are unified in space and time. It has significant seasonal variation features, showing a double-peak structure of negative anomalies in winter (January to March) and positive anomalies in summer (July to September). Combining the reanalysis data of ERA5, it is found that there is a dynamic divergence mechanism of OBP oscillation between the northern and southern areas of the Arabian Sea. The southern area is dominated by wind stress curl, with a negative correlation response leading OBP by 30° (about 1 month). The northern area is regulated by the wind-driven Ekman process, with Ekman pumping/suction leading by 1 month to trigger a positive correlation. This divergence mechanism is attributed to the boundary constraint effect of the meridional mean atmospheric pressure standard deviation. The impact of the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) on OBP shows seasonal asymmetry: in summer, OBP is significantly correlated with the dipole mode index (DMI) leading by 6 months, while in winter, the correlation between the mean OBP and the DMI in each mounth is not significance.

Key words

ocean bottom pressure / GRACE / wind stress curl / Ekman pumping/suction / Arabian Sea

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Kun , ZHANG Tao , WU Binjie , et al . Seasonal variability and its influencing factors of ocean bottom pressure in the Arabian Sea[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences. 2026, 44(1): 83-92 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.01.007

References

[1]
EBLE M C, GONZALEZ F I. Deep-ocean bottom pressure measurements in the northeast Pacific[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1991, 8(2): 221-233.
[2]
QUINN K J, PONTE R M. Estimating high frequency ocean bottom pressure variability: High frequency ocean bottom pressure[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(8): L08611.
[3]
PONTE R M. A preliminary model study of the large-scale seasonal cycle in bottom pressure over the global ocean[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1999, 104(C1): 1289-1300.
[4]
GILLA E, NILLER P P. The theory of the seasonal variability in the ocean[J]. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 1973, 20(2): 141-177.
[5]
STEPANOV V N, HUGHES C W. Propagation of signals in basin-scale ocean bottom pressure from a barotropic model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2006, 111(C12): 2005JC003450.
[6]
CHENG X H, LI L J, DU Y, et al. Mass-induced sea level change in the northwestern North Pacific and its contribution to total sea level change[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2013, 40(15): 3975-3980.
[7]
XIONG X Q, CHENG X H, OU N S, et al. Dynamics of seasonal and interannual variability of the ocean bottom pressure in the Southern Ocean[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(5): 78-89.
[8]
CHAMBERS D P, CAZENAVE A, CHAMPOLLION N, et al. Evaluation of the global mean sea level budget between 1993 and 2014[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2017, 38(1): 309-327.
[9]
BROWN W, MUNK W, SNODGRASS F, et al. MODE bottom experiment[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1975, 5(1): 75-85.
[10]
LUTHER D S. Evidence of a 4-6 day barotropic, planetary oscillation of the Pacific Ocean[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1982, 12(7): 644-657.
[11]
DONOHUE K, WATTS D R, TRACEY K, et al. Program studies the Kuroshio Extension[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2008, 89(17): 161-162.
[12]
SAVE H, BETTADPUR S, TAPLEY B D. High-resolution CSR grace RL05 mascons[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2016, 121(10): 7547-7569.
[13]
SAVE H, BETTADPUR S, NAGEL P, et al. Mascon estimation strategies for CSR GRACE RL06 and GRACE-FO gravity fields[J]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2019, 21: EGU2019-11963.
[14]
MATHERS E L, WOODWORTH P L. Departures from the local inverse barometer model observed in altimeter and tide gauge data and in a global barotropic numerical model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2001, 106(C4): 6957-6972.
[15]
FU L L. Wind-forced intraseasonal sea level variability of the extratropical oceans[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2003, 33(2): 436-449.
[16]
HIROSE N, FUKUMORI I, ZLOTNICKI V, et al. Modeling the high-frequency barotropic response of the ocean to atmospheric disturbances: Sensitivity to forcing, topography, and friction[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2001, 106(C12): 30987-30995.
[17]
NIU Y T, CHENG X H, QIN J H, et al. Mechanisms of interannual variability of ocean bottom pressure in the southern Indian ocean[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2022, 9: 916592.
The study of ocean bottom pressure (OBP) helps to understand the changes in the sea level budget and ocean deep circulation. In this study, the characteristics and mechanisms of interannual OBP variability in the Southern Indian Ocean are examined using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data from 2003 to 2016. Results show that there are two energetic OBP centers in the Southern Indian Ocean (50°–60°S, 40°–60°E and 45°–60°S, 80°–120°E). The OBP magnitudes at two centers have strong variability on interannual time scales, and their values are larger during austral summer (NDJF) and winter (JJAS). Atmospheric forcing plays an important role in local OBP variability. The high (low) sea level pressure (SLP) over the Southern Indian Ocean benefits positive (negative) OBP anomalies via the convergence (divergence) of Ekman transport driven by local wind. Such SLP anomalies are related to the Southern Annular Mode (SAM), Southern Oscillation (SO) and Indian Ocean dipole (IOD). SAM can influence the OBP changes in both austral summer and winter, while SO and IOD have positive correlations with OBP variability during austral summer and austral winter, respectively. These results are validated by a mass-conservation ocean model, which further confirms the importance of atmospheric forcing on the interannual OBP variations.
[18]
QIN J H, CHENG X H, YANG C C, et al. Mechanism of interannual variability of ocean bottom pressure in the South Pacific[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2022, 59(7): 2103-2116.
[19]
PARK J H, WATTS D R. Response of the southwestern Japan/East Sea to atmospheric pressure[J]. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2005, 52(11-13): 1671-1683.
[20]
NA H N, PARK J H, WATTS D R, et al. Near 13 day barotropic ocean response to the atmospheric forcing in the North Pacific[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2012, 117(C12): 2012JC008211.
[21]
PARK J H, WATTS D R, DONOHUE K A, et al. A comparison of in situ bottom pressure array measurements with GRACE estimates in the Kuroshio Extension[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35(17): 2008GL034778.
[22]
CAZENAVE A, CABANES C, DOMINH K, et al. Present-day sea level change: Observations and causes[J]. Space Science Reviews, 2003, 108(1): 131-144.
[23]
CHAMBERS D P. Evaluation of new GRACE time-variable gravity data over the ocean[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(17): 2006GL027296.
[24]
SONG Y T, ZLOTNICKI V. Subpolar ocean bottom pressure oscillation and its links to the tropical ENSO[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29(21): 6091-6107.
[25]
MO K C. Relationships between low-frequency variability in the southern hemisphere and sea surface temperature anomalies[J]. Journal of Climate, 2000, 13(20): 3599-3610.
[26]
LEE T, HOBBS W R, WILLIS J K, et al. Record warming in the South Pacific and Western Antarctica associated with the strong Central-Pacific El Nio in 2009-10[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010, 37: 1-6.
[27]
景雪懿, 程旭华. 印度洋海底压强的季节和长期变化[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(5):10-17.
Abstract
利用2003—2015年的重力恢复和气候实验(Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, GRACE)卫星观测数据, 揭示了印度洋海底压强的变化特征, 并探讨了其变化机制。结果表明, 印度洋海底压强具有显著的季节变化特征, 北半球冬季在40°S以北(南), 海底压强呈负(正)异常, 夏季分布与冬季相反。印度洋区域的海底压强空间分布与Ekman输送空间分布有较好的对应关系。正压涡度方程诊断结果表明, 利用风场重构的海底压强能够较好地解释印度洋海底压强的季节和长期变化。此外, 海平面变化收支分析表明, 海底压强的变化在高纬度区域主导了海平面变化。
JING X Y, CHENG X H. Seasonal and long-term variability of ocean bottom pressure in the Indian Ocean[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2019, 38(5): 10-17.

Using the GRACE satellite observation during 2003-2015, we reveal characteristics of the ocean bottom pressure (OBP) variability in the Indian Ocean, and explore their potential dynamics. The results show that the OBP in the Indian Ocean has significant seasonal variability. In the boreal winter, the OBP shows negative (positive) anomaly north (south) of 40 oS; and the pattern in summer is opposite to that in winter. The spatial pattern of the Ekman transport has a good correspondence with the OBP pattern in the Indian Ocean. The diagnosis results derived from the barotropic vorticity equation show that the OBP reconstructed by sea surface wind can better explain both the seasonal and long-term variations of the OBP in the Indian Ocean. In addition, analysis of sea level budget suggests that variation of OBP dominates sea level changes at high latitudes.

[28]
CHENG X H, OU N S, CHEN J J, et al. On the seasonal variations of ocean bottom pressure in the world oceans[J]. Geoscience Letters, 2021, 8(1): 29.
Seasonal variability of the ocean bottom pressure (OBP) in the world oceans is investigated using 15 years of GRACE observations and a Pressure Coordinate Ocean Model (PCOM). In boreal winter, negative OBP anomalies appear in the northern North Pacific, subtropical South Pacific and north of 40 °S in the Indian Ocean, while OBP anomaly in the Southern Ocean is positive. The summer pattern is opposite to that in winter. The centers of positive (negative) OBP signals have a good coherence with the mass convergence/divergence due to Ekman transport, indicating the importance of wind forcing. The PCOM model reproduces the observed OBP quite well. Sensitivity experiments indicate that wind forcing dominates the regional OBP seasonal variations, while the contributions due to heat flux and freshwater flux are unimportant. Experiments with daily sea level pressure (SLP) forcing suggest that at high frequencies the non-static effect of SLP is not negligible.
[29]
BATCHELOR G K. An introduction to fluid dynamics[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
[30]
吴望一. 流体力学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1983.
WU W Y. Fluid mechanics[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1983.
[31]
TALLEY L D, PICKARD G L, EMERY W J, et al. Dynamical processes for descriptive ocean circulation[M]//Descriptive Physical Oceanography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.
[32]
NAYAK M R, EMERY W J, THOMSON R E. Data analysis methods in physical oceanography[J]. Estuaries, 1999, 22(3): 728.
PDF(4461 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/