PDF(5554 KB)
Accumulation period of Yongle 10-6 Structure in the southern step-fault zone, Baodao Sag of Qiongdongnan Basin
JIANG Zhonghui, HU Lin, LIU Xianfeng, HE Xiaohu, YUAN Feifei, GAN Jun, FENG Yong
Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 51-64.
PDF(5554 KB)
PDF(5554 KB)
Accumulation period of Yongle 10-6 Structure in the southern step-fault zone, Baodao Sag of Qiongdongnan Basin
The Qiongdongnan Basin, a Cenozoic petroliferous basin in the northern South China Sea, is rich in deepwater hydrocarbon resources and represents a critical frontier for Chinese offshore exploration. This study integrated core samples, well logging data, and analytical techniques including fluid inclusion petrography, oil inclusion abundance (GOI) analysis, and homogenization temperature measurements from four wells (W1-W4) targeting the Lingshui Formation in the Yongle 10-6 Structure. Burial-thermal history modeling combined with hydrocarbon generation evolution and fault activity analysis were employed to reconstruct hydrocarbon charging episodes and accumulation processes. The results showed that three distinct inclusion types were identified in Member 3 of the Lingshui Formation: liquid oil inclusions, single CH4 gas inclusions, and CO2-bearing aqueous inclusions. Blue fluorescence of oil inclusions indicated a high-maturity oil charging. GOI values of 1.23% (W2) and 3.5% (W3) suggested the study intervals served as hydrocarbon migration pathways. Three hydrocarbon charging episodes were constrained: Early Miocene (20.9-17.2 Ma), Late Miocene (10.2-7.6 Ma), Pliocene to present (5.0-0.0 Ma). Among them, oil-dominated charging occurred in the Early Miocene and Pliocene, whereas gas-dominated charging prevailed in the Late Miocene and Pleistocene. Since the Pleistocene (2.0 Ma), mantle-derived CO2 charging had been ongoing and continued to the present. Spatially, hydrocarbon charging occurred earlier in northern structural belt (W1, W2) than that in southern structure belt (W3, W4). While CH4 and CO2 charging were recorded in all four wells, oil accumulation was observed only in W2 and W3 with relatively high-maturity. The Baodao Sag exhibited two-phase hydrocarbon generation from source rocks. Early fault activity (later ceasing) resulted in differential accumulation characterized by early oil and late gas charging, earlier accumulation in the north and later in the south, and multi-stage accumulation. This work delineates the hydrocarbon charging phases in the less-explored Baodao Sag of the Qiongdongnan Basin, reconstructs the hydrocarbon accumulation history, and provides guiding significance for predicting future exploration targets.
fluid inclusions / Raman measurement / fluorescence spectrum / hydrocarbon charging history / hydrocarbon accumulation / Lingshui Formation / Yongle10-6 / Qiongdongnan Basin
| [1] |
鲁雪松. 油气成藏年代学分析技术与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017:1-14.
|
| [2] |
陈红汉. 油气成藏年代学研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(2):143-150.
|
| [3] |
卢焕章. 流体包裹体[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004:241-259.
|
| [4] |
郑有业, 王思源, 李小菊, 等. 有机包裹体研究在石油地质领域中的应用现状[J]. 地质地球化学, 1998, 26(2):72-76.
|
| [5] |
刘德汉, 肖贤明, 田辉, 等. 含油气盆地中流体包裹体类型及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(4):491-501.
|
| [6] |
王昱, 李文昌, 孔志岗, 等. 云南麻花坪钨铍矿成矿流体特征及矿床成因探讨:来自流体包裹体与H-O-He-Ar同位素的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2025, 41(6):2088-2105.
|
| [7] |
席斌斌, 蒋宏, 许锦, 等. 基于包裹体PVTx数值模拟恢复油藏古温压:存在的问题、对策及应用实例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5):886-895.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
裴健翔, 罗威, 呙诗阳, 等. 琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷南部渐新统陵水组三段三角洲的发现及石油地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(2):299-310.
|
| [10] |
刘正华, 陈红汉. 琼东南盆地东部地区油气形成期次和时期[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(2):279-288.
|
| [11] |
徐长贵, 邓勇, 吴克强, 等. 南海北部强活动型被动陆缘盆地宝岛21-1大气田的发现及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(5):713-729.
|
| [12] |
周杰, 朱继田, 杨金海, 等. 琼东南盆地深水区宝南断阶带断裂特征及天然气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1):87-95.
|
| [13] |
尤丽, 权永彬, 庹雷, 等. 琼东南盆地深水区宝岛21-1气田天然气来源及输导体系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(5):1270-1278.
|
| [14] |
王子嵩, 刘震, 黄保家, 等. 琼东南盆地深水区中央坳陷带东部渐新统烃源岩分布及评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(3):360-371.
|
| [15] |
朱继田, 裴健翔, 孙志鹏, 等. 琼东南盆地新构造运动及其对晚期油气成藏的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(4):649-656.
|
| [16] |
何家雄, 夏斌, 孙东山, 等. 琼东南盆地油气成藏组合、运聚规律与勘探方向分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1):53-58.
|
| [17] |
胡杨, 张伟, 张景茹, 等. 南海北部大陆边缘琼东南盆地有利油气聚集带及勘探方向[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2015, 35(4):73-86.
|
| [18] |
姚兴宗, 封从军, 屈红军, 等. 琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷陵水组—三亚组海底扇沉积模式及源—汇过程[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(12):2075-2086.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
刘可禹,
|
| [21] |
斯尚华, 赵靖舟, 刘俊邦, 等. 利用油包裹体荧光光谱确定齐家地区高台子油层致密油气成藏期次及其相对成熟度[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6):78-86.
|
| [22] |
何谋春, 吕新彪, 刘艳荣. 激光拉曼光谱在油气勘探中的应用研究初探[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2004, 24(11):1363-1366.
|
| [23] |
柳少波, 顾家裕. 包裹体在石油地质研究中的应用与问题讨论[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(4):326-331,342.
|
| [24] |
米立军, 袁玉松, 张功成, 等. 南海北部深水区地热特征及其成因[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(1):27-32.
|
| [25] |
张迎朝, 甘军, 杨希冰, 等. 琼东南盆地陵水凹陷构造演化及其对深水大气田形成的控制作用[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(10):22-31.
|
| [26] |
黄向胜, 闫琢玉, 张东峰, 等. 琼东南盆地Ⅱ号断裂带新生界多期热流体活动与天然气运聚特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5):67-76.
|
| [27] |
徐新德, 张迎朝, 梁刚, 等. 南海北部琼东南盆地深水区烃源条件及天然气成藏机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11):1985-1992.
|
| [28] |
徐新德, 张迎朝, 熊小峰, 等. 南海北部莺—琼盆地CO2成因与成藏特征及其分布规律[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2017, 33(7):45-54.
|
| [29] |
李兴, 尤丽, 詹冶萍, 等. 琼东南盆地松南-宝岛凹陷北部断阶带油气来源与成藏时间[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(8):3007-3020.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |