Ecotoxicological effects of mercury pollution on marine organisms under global climate change

CHEN Yao, SU Rong, WANG Fangzhou

Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 85-92.

PDF(1481 KB)
PDF(1481 KB)
Journal of Marine Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 85-92. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.02.009

Ecotoxicological effects of mercury pollution on marine organisms under global climate change

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Under global climate change, the combined effects of ocean acidification and warming on mercury (Hg) ecotoxicity and their underlying mechanisms have become a research focus in environmental science. This paper has comprehensively reviewed existing studies and analyzed the interactive effects of acidification and warming on Hg bioaccumulation, toxicity effects, and biological responses. The key findings reveal that ocean acidification primarily mitigates Hg toxicity by inhibiting Hg bioaccumulation and inducing energy compensation and stress responses in organisms, demonstrating their antagonistic interaction. In contrast, warming exerts a synergistic effect with Hg pollution, i.e., exacerbating Hg toxicity by increasing metabolic rates, promoting Hg accumulation, and inducing oxidative damage. Under the more realistic scenario of combined acidification and warming, the inhibitory effect of acidification on Hg accumulation is partially offset, while immune defense downregulation and reproductive damage are intensified, ultimately leading to an overall enhancement of Hg toxicity. These findings suggest that assessments based solely on single climate stressors (acidification or warming) may substantially underestimate the long-term ecological risks of Hg pollution in marine ecosystems. Such underestimation stems from the neglect of warming’s counteraction on acidification and the dual energy demand arising from combined acidification and warming exceeding an organism’s compensatory capacity. Future research should prioritize integrated assessments across multi-stressors, multigenerational exposure, and ecosystem levels to reveal the complex mechanisms of Hg toxicity under global climate change, provide a scientific basis for developing accurate risk management strategies.

Key words

ocean acidification / ocean warming / mercury pollution / interaction / multi-generation / molecular mechanisms / ecological risk assessment

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Yao , SU Rong , WANG Fangzhou. Ecotoxicological effects of mercury pollution on marine organisms under global climate change[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences. 2026, 44(2): 85-92 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2026.02.009

References

[1]
KRABBENHOFT D P, SUNDERLAND E M. Global change and mercury[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6153): 1457-1458.
[2]
WANG Y J, WU P P, ZHANG Y X. Climate-driven changes of global marine mercury cycles in 2100[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(2): e2202488120.
[3]
WEI H, XIE D M, WANG D Z, et al. A meta-analysis reveals global change stressors potentially aggravate mercury toxicity in marine biota[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58(1): 219-230.
[4]
PIRRONE N, CINNIRELLA S, FENG X, et al. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10(13): 5951-5964.
[5]
OUTRIDGE P M, MASON R P, WANG F, et al. Updated global and oceanic mercury budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(20): 11466-11477.
[6]
JISKRA M, HEIMBÜRGER-BOAVIDA L E, DESGRANGES M M, et al. Mercury stable isotopes constrain atmospheric sources to the ocean[J]. Nature, 2021, 597(7878): 678-682.
[7]
LIU M D, ZHANG Q R, MAAVARA T, et al. Rivers as the largest source of mercury to coastal oceans worldwide[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14(9): 672-677.
[8]
UNEP. An assessment report on issues of concern: Chemicals and waste issues posing risks to human health and the environment[R]. UNEP, 2020. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/33807.
[9]
LIU M D, CHEN L, WANG X J, et al. Mercury export from mainland China to adjacent seas and its influence on the marine mercury balance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(12): 6224-6232.
[10]
GAO X L, ZHOU F X, CHEN C A. Pollution status of the Bohai Sea: An overview of the environmental quality assess-ment related trace metals[J]. Environment International, 2014, 62: 12-30.
[11]
GB 3097—1997 海水水质标准[S].
GB 3097—1997 Sea water quality standard[S].
[12]
ZHOU S Y, KANG R, JI C N, et al. Heavy metal distribution, contamination and analysis of sources-Intertidal zones of Sandu Bay, Ningde, China[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 135: 1138-1144.
[13]
XIAO C L, JIAN H M, CHEN L F, et al. Toxic metal pollution in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea, China: Distribution, controlling factors and potential risk[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2017, 119(1): 381-389.
[14]
TIAN K, WU Q M, LIU P, et al. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediments and water from the coastal areas of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea[J]. Environment International, 2020, 136: 105512.
[15]
WANG M H, CHEN J Y, LEE Y H, et al. Projected near-future ocean acidification decreases mercury toxicity in marine copepods[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 284: 117140.
[16]
LI H Y, SHI L, WANG D Z, et al. Impacts of mercury exposure on life history traits of Tigriopus japonicus: Multigeneration effects and recovery from pollution[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2015, 166: 42-49.
[17]
CARDOSO P G, MARQUES S C, D’AMBROSIO M, et al. Changes in zooplankton communities along a mercury contamination gradient in a coastal lagoon (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal)[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013, 76(1/2): 170-177.
[18]
DICKMAN M D, LEUNG K M C, KOO L C L. Mercury in human hair and fish: Is there a Hong Kong male subfertility connection?[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1999, 39(1-12): 352-356.
[19]
IPCC. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis[R]// Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[20]
MELZNER F, MARK F C, SEIBEL B A, et al. Ocean acidification and coastal marine invertebrates: Tracking CO2 effects from seawater to the cell[J]. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2020, 12: 499-523.
[21]
ZHAO Y Y, LIU J, UTHAIPAN K, et al. Dynamics of inorganic carbon and pH in a large subtropical continental shelf system: Interaction between eutrophication, hypoxia, and ocean acidification[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2020, 65(6): 1359-1379.
[22]
WANG M H, JEONG C B, LEE Y H, et al. Effects of ocean acidification on copepods[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2018, 196: 17-24.
[23]
LI Y, WANG W X, WANG M H. Alleviation of mercury toxicity to a marine copepod under multigenerational exposure by ocean acidification[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 324.
[24]
WANG M H, LEE J S, LI Y. Global proteome profiling of a marine copepod and the mitigating effect of ocean acidification on mercury toxicity after multigenerational exposure[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(10): 5820-5831.
[25]
SAMPAIO E, LOPES A R, FRANCISCO S, et al. Ocean acidification dampens physiological stress response to warming and contamination in a commercially-important fish (Argyrosomus regius)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 388-398.
[26]
CAO R W, ZHANG Y L, JU Y H, et al. Exacerbation of copper pollution toxicity from ocean acidification: A comparative analysis of two bivalve species with distinct sensitivities[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 293: 118525.
[27]
ZHENG J, LI Q, ZHENG X D. Ocean acidification increases copper accumulation and exacerbates copper toxicity in Amphioctopus fangsiao (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): A potential threat to seafood safety[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 891: 164473.
[28]
MILLERO F J, WOOSLEY R, DITROLIO B, et al. Effect of ocean acidification on the speciation of metals in seawater[J]. Oceanography, 2009, 22(4): 72-85.
[29]
BAI Z A, WANG N, KIM M S, et al. Physiological and molecular responses of a marine copepod under multigene-rational exposure to coastal warming and mercury at an environmentally realistic concentration[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2023, 10(3): 240-246.
[30]
CAMACHO C, MAULVAULT A L, SANTOS M T, et al. Mercury in juvenile Solea senegalensis: Linking bioaccu-mulation, seafood safety, and neuro-oxidative responses under climate change-related stressors[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(6): 1993.
[31]
DIJKSTRA J A, BUCKMAN K L, WARD D, et al. Experimental and natural warming elevates mercury concentrations in estuarine fish[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(3): e58401.
[32]
MAULVAULT A L, CUSTÓDIO A, ANACLETO P, et al. Bioaccumulation and elimination of mercury in juvenile seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in a warmer environment[J]. Environmental Research, 2016, 149: 77-85.
[33]
SCHARTUP A T, THACKRAY C P, QURESHI A, et al. Climate change and overfishing increase neurotoxicant in marine predators[J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7771): 648-650.
[34]
LIN S R, ZHAO F K, CHEN Y, et al. Multigenerational impact of global change: Increased mercury toxicity in a marine copepod[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2025, 481: 136505.
[35]
BAI Z A, WANG M H. Warmer temperature increases mercury toxicity in a marine copepod[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 201: 110861.
PDF(1481 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/