水体颗粒后向散射系数测量一致性对比实验研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2021.01.001

海洋学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-909X.2021.01.001

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

水体颗粒后向散射系数测量一致性对比实验研究

张翾^1,2,3, 何贤强^*1,2,3, 龚芳^2,3, 朱乾坤^2,3

1.南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(湛江),广东湛江 524006;
2.卫星海洋环境动力学国家重点实验室,浙江杭州 310012;
3.自然资源部第二海洋研究所,浙江杭州 310012

收稿日期:2020-06-17 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-15
通讯作者: *何贤强(1978-),男,研究员,主要从事海洋、大气辐射传输及海洋水色卫星遥感研究。E-mail:hexianqiang@sio.org.cn
作者简介:张翾(1986-),男,浙江省杭州市人,工程师,主要从事海洋水色遥感研究。E-mail:tualatin@yeah.net
基金资助:
南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(湛江)(湛江湾实验室)项目(ZJW-2019-08);浙江省重点研发计划(2017C03037)

Experimental study on the consistency of measurements of water particulate backscattering coefficient

ZHANG Xuan^1,2,3, HE Xianqiang^*1,2,3, GONG Fang^2,3, ZHU Qiankun^2,3

1. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhangjiang), Zhanjiang 524006, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Hangzhou 310012, China;
3. Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

Received:2020-06-17 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 颗粒后向散射系数是水体最重要的固有光学参量之一,也是海洋水色卫星遥感的核心参数。现场准确测量水体颗粒后向散射数据,对于水色遥感模型构建以及水色遥感产品真实性检验至关重要。本文针对常用的3种水体颗粒后向散射系数原位测量仪(HydroScat6,VSF3和BB9),通过比测实验,对三者测量结果的一致性进行了比较分析。结果表明,在清洁水体中3种仪器对颗粒后向散射系数测量具有较好的一致性;但在浑浊水体中,HydroScat6和BB9测量值会比VSF3高,三者偏差显著增大。同时,数值模拟和实验结果均表明,颗粒形状会对测量结果产生影响,3种仪器对球形颗粒的后向散射系数测量结果的一致性显著好于野外颗粒结果。

关键词: 水体颗粒, 后向散射系数, 实验测量, 散射系数测量仪

Abstract: The backscattering coefficient of particles is one of the most important inherent optical parameters of water body, and also is the core parameter of ocean color remote sensing. It is very important to measure the backscattering coefficient data of particles in water accurately in-situ for the construction of water color remote sensing model and the authenticity test of water color remote sensing products. In this study, the consistency of these three kinds of in-situ instruments(HydroScat6, VSF3 and BB9) for measuring backscattering coefficient of water particles were compared and analyzed. The results show that the measurements by these three kinds of instruments have good consistency in clean water, but in the turbid water, the measurements of HydroScat6 and BB9 are higher than those of VSF3, and their deviations are significantly increased. Based on numerical simulations and laboratory measurements, it is found that the shapes of particles affect the consistency of measurements by the three instruments, and the consistency is better for spherical particles than that of field particles.

Key words: water particles, backscattering coefficient, experimental measurement, water scatterometer

中图分类号:

P715
P733.3

张翾, 何贤强, 龚芳, 朱乾坤. 水体颗粒后向散射系数测量一致性对比实验研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(1): 1-8.

ZHANG Xuan, HE Xianqiang, GONG Fang, ZHU Qiankun. Experimental study on the consistency of measurements of water particulate backscattering coefficient[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences, 2021, 39(1): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] TWARDOWSKI M S, BOSS E, SULLIVAN J M, et al. Modeling the spectral shape of absorption by chromophoric dissolved organic matter[J]. Marine Chemistry, 2004, 89(1-4): 69-88.
[2] BOSS E, PEGAU W S, LEE M, et al. Particulate backscattering ratio at LEO 15 and its use to study particle composition and distribution[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2004, 109(1): C01014.
[3] TWARDOWSKI M S, CLAUSTRE H, FREEMAN S A, et al. Optical backscattering properties of the “clearest” natural waters [J]. Biogeosciences, 2007, 4(6): 1041-1058.
[4] BOSS E. HydroScat6 spectral backscattering sensor user's manual[EB/OL].(2010-8-23)[2020-06-20]. www.hobilabs.com.
[5] ZEE V H. BB9 user's guide[EB/OL]. (2010-01-21) [2020-06-20]. www.wetlabs.com.
[6] MOREL A. Optical properties of pure water and pure sea water[C]//JERLOV N G, STEEMAN N E. Optical aspects of oceanography. New York: Academic Press, 1974: 1-24.
[7] WATERMAN P C. New formulation of acoustic scattering[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969, 45(6): 1417- 1429.
[8] MISHCHENKO M I. Light scattering by randomly oriented axially symmetric particles[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1991, 8(6): 871-882.
[9] WHITMIRE A L, PEGAU W S, KARP-BOSS L, et al. Spectral backscattering properties of marine phytoplankton cultures[J]. Optics Express, 2010, 18(14): 15073-15093.
[10] WHITMIRE A L, BOSS E, COWLES T J, et al. Spectral variability of the particulate backscattering ratio[J]. Optics Express, 2007, 15(11): 7019-7031.
[11] BOSS E, PEGAU W S. Relationship of light scattering at an angle in the backward direction to the backscattering coefficient[J]. Applied Optics, 2001, 40(30): 5503-5507.
[12] FOURNIER G R, FORAND J L. Analytic phase function for ocean water[C]//JAFFE J S. Proc. SPIE Ocean Optics XII. Bellingham: The Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1994: 194-201.
[13] GORDON H R, LEWIS M R, MCLEAN S D, et al. Spectra of particulate backscattering in natural waters[J]. Optics Express, 2009, 17(18): 16192-16208.
[14] MOBLEY C D, SUNDMAN L K, BOSS E. Phase function effects on oceanic light fields[J]. Applied Optics, 2002, 41(6): 1035-1050.
[15] CHAMI M, MARKEN E, STAMNERS J J, et al. Variability of the relationship between the particulate backscattering coefficient and the volume scattering function measured at fixed angles[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2006, 111(1): C05013.
[16] MAFFINE R A, DANA D R. Instruments and methods for measuring the backward-scattering coefficient of ocean waters[J]. Applied Optics, 1997, 36(24): 6057-6067.

水体颗粒后向散射系数测量一致性对比实验研究

Experimental study on the consistency of measurements of water particulate backscattering coefficient

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王贵凯, 马纯永, 高占文, 张胜胜, 陈戈. 基于牛顿力学积分的水下滑翔机群协同控制研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(1): 29-37.
[2]	林明祥, 蔡廷禄, 王欣凯, 夏小明. 近百年来浙江三门湾海岸线时空演变特征[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(1): 47-55.
[3]	罗正宇, 张丽, 陈博伟, 孙灏, 毕京鹏. 1990-2020年泰国海岸线时空变迁分析[J]. 海洋学研究, 2021, 39(1): 56-66.
[4]	谢春虎, 徐苗苗, 曹莎莎, 张勇, 张春玲. 基于梯度依赖客观分析技术的全球Argo网格化数据集:构建及初步应用[J]. 海洋学研究, 2019, 37(4): 24-35.